Communication
is an imprecise process – no matter how much effort and innovation
we may put into choice of words, method of delivery, and focus on key
points. Try as we will, the full transfer of knowledge from our mind
to the listener happens only in the Vulcan
Mind Meld. Typically a just a portion of what is said is
actually received by the listener and a fraction of that is retained.
An
analogy of how the mind processes new information that I like is of a
mail
sorting station full of pigeonholes for similarly addressed
letters. When new information is received, the mind looks for bins
of similar items to authenticate and store it. No bin of similar
information but holds some interest – the mind retains it for a
period of time as a data point; no interest: no processing. As
additional data points are received, the mind may assign a bin for
the topic. If not, the data points will be pushed aside for other
active thoughts and ideas.
To
illustrate - think back to the 1990's and the Y2K issue – when the
issue was first mentioned there was little reaction or interest.
Over time, with repeated mention and additional interpretation of the
impact, it became a significant element of the coming of the
millennium. To the mind it went from a data point to an issue.
As we
listen, we are processing the information based on what we have been
exposed to earlier – through reading, conversation, events,
observation, and doing. When we actually do a task or project, we
learn on several levels, including how skill and experience can
influence an outcome. When I wanted to play tennis, I read a number
of books about basics, strategy, and tips from the pros – but truly
learned about the game once I stepped on the court to play.
When
we listen through the amplification of our own experience, we deepen
our understanding of the topic and benefit from the experience of the
speaker as conveyed by their story.
Building
a website, writing an article, making a table, or trimming a shrub
provides valuable 'doer' experience to add to the current body of
knowledge. Doing will broaden your perspective on a topic and will
make you a more effective listener and learner.
While
you may speak from experience, the listener who hears through their
experience gets a richer benefit from the information.
Doesn't
it make sense to seek projects and activities that expose us to new
experiences – to keep current and to learn new things? Learning by
doing is a requirement for the New
Normal.
How has experiential
listening helped you master a topic?
No comments:
Post a Comment