Business
has changed – how we do it, where we work, what we are
responsible for, and who we are working with has been radically
shaken – sometimes I feel like the paint can
in that
shaking mixer at the paint
store.
Working
smart and efficiently is needed
to cover the additional responsibilities we inherited as others left
the organization. Nevertheless,
several of the old practices seem
untouched by this new reality – like the written weekly
report to a manager or the
Monday Morning Meeting.
An
update report to the manager is a one-on-one, asynchronous
communication – from
writer to reader. Often in a
mark-up format – freshening
up the statistics
while leaving the prose
intact – the report shares
metrics without intelligence or current conditions. Many
writers see it as a time
consuming task of no direct value in reaching goals and delivering
results.
The
Monday Morning Meetings
were not efficient when
everyone was in the same location – come in early or break in to
the day's schedule to sit for an hour or more to speak for about 5
minutes. When locations and resources increased, these
meetings became more
unwieldy
to schedule and virtually attend. And
people resist
going
to meetings
– too
many are time wasters without obvious purpose or
tangible results.
The
status
meeting is an effective way to share intelligence about
individual and organization
progress, market intelligence, and customer feedback.
A
status meeting has 5 principal elements for each stakeholder to
share crisply:
- What are your goals for this week?
- What results did you achieve?
- What changes did you make to get better results?
- What was the best things you learned about the marketplace, customers, competitors – what will benefit your co-stakeholders in achieving their goals?
- What are your goals for next week?
No
need to prepare handouts or written documents for a status meeting –
participants will take notes on items of interest to them. Sharing
goals, results, and what was
learned outside the
organization, is of value to all participants and can help
build teamwork in the
process.
Can the status meeting scale and still be effective? General Stanley McChrystal when Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) held a similar meeting: 'As We See It' session with 70 nodes around the region for 90 minutes everyday – he said this was the most effective way to tap local knowledge of enemy activities and keep all units up to date on current information and plans.
I
find that it takes about 6 weeks or so of weekly meetings to
understand the meeting
format and get everyone
participating fully, but once there it is a meeting that participants
find useful. Just the collective market intelligence alone from
the status meetings can magnify
the scope of current knowledge far
beyond what one individual
could typically observe.
Worth
trying, if you want to build your organization's effectiveness.